Home
Workshops
Links
About Us

Austin ISD PER Workshop - June 2-4, 2003

On June 2-4, 2003 we conducted the fourth in a series of Austin-based PER workshops. We again invited the in service teachers who have been involved with our PT3 grant and previous PER workshops as well as members of the VaNTH SLC (Student Leadership Council).

Participants and Schedule of Events

The focus of this fourth workshop was to provide additional and sustained assistance to the teachers as they continued to design original LEGACY cycles. We began day one of the workshop with research assistant Barb Austin leading the group through some activities from Understanding By Design (Wiggins & McTighe, 1999). The goal of these activities was to help the teachers build on their specific content ideas generated during previous workshops in an effort to prepare those ideas for inclusion in a LEGACY Cycle framework. Austin began with a presentation (download Powerpoint) designed to help the teachers identify the underlying and enduring understandings related to their content ideas. Austin continued with an activity focused on helping the teachers frame some essential questions that address the enduring understandings previously identified.

Barb Austin helps Elaine Bohls-Grahm with her LEGACY cycle.

Angie Seckar-Martinez and Shelly Rodriguez discuss ideas for a LEGACY Cycle challenge based on the Pythagorean theorem.


The day continued with a presentation (download PowerPoint) by research assistant Cherie McCollough on evidence for understanding. At this time, the teachers began to formulate what would become their challenge questions. McCollough also encouraged the teachers to make decisions about how to assess the essential questions developed in the earlier sessions. Through these activities, the teachers were given opportunities to think deeply about their learning goals and objectives for what would become their LEGACY Cycles. By the day’s end, teachers were given time to present their challenge questions and assessment ideas to the group for constructive feedback.

Day two began with a presentation (download PowerPoint) by Cherie McCollough on designing rubrics. McCollough and the teachers discussed how different levels of knowledge (e.g. content worth being familiar with, content important to know and do, or content that leads to enduring understanding) often require different types of assessment strategies, which in turn need different types of rubric design. Through a series of activities, the teachers worked on articulating the important elements of their assessment ideas from the previous day that should be included in rubrics.

Carolyn McCormick presents her initial ideas on a LEGACY Cycle on Homeostasis and Eating Disorders.

Richard Vath introduces Elaine Bohls-Grahm to a web template for a LEGACY Cycle challenge.


The day continued with a presentation (download PowerPoint) by research assistant Richard Vath, during which the group revisited some of the theoretical ideas behind the LEGACY Cycle and its components. It was now time for the teachers to begin to flesh out their LEGACY Cycles, extending on their work from the previous day and previous workshops. With the help of Cherie McCollough, Shelly Rodriguez, and Richard Vath, the teachers spent the remainder of the day articulating what they would include in each component of their LEGACY Cycles. They were also introduced to a basic web template that would allow them to build a web page around their LEGACY Cycles.

On the final day of the workshop, the teachers were introduced to the work of Stacy Klein, a Research Assistant Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt University and a Physics, Math, and Biomedical Physics Teacher at the University School of Nashville. Dr. Klein has years of experience with developing and teaching with LEGACY Cycle modules in her high school classroom. After introducing the teachers to some of the LEGACY cycles she has developed, (download PowerPoint) she and the group discussed some of the general challenges to implementing modules such as these in real classrooms. She concluded the day’s activities by offering her advice and suggestions to the teachers as they continued to develop and refine their own LEGACY cycles.

Carolyn McCormick and Tony Petrosino discuss the role of systemic thinking in her LEGACY Cycle.

Stacy Klein discusses some of her experiences with using the LEGACY Cycle model in her own high school classroom.


Additional workshops are being planned for the fall of 2003 to provide support for these teachers as they finalize their LEGACY cycles and prepare for classroom implementation.

 

Group photo
(Front, L-R) Melissa Tothero, Tony Petrosino, Shelly Rodriguez, Richard Vath
(Back, L-R) Jesse Gonzales, Angie Seckar-Martinez, T. Michael Word, Elaine Bohls-Graham,
Cherie Bielke, Carolyn McCormick, Cherie McCollough