 |
Home
Workshops
Links
About Us
|
 |
Austin ISD PER Workshop - June 2-4, 2003
On June 2-4, 2003
we conducted the fourth in a series of Austin-based PER workshops. We
again invited the in service teachers who have been involved with our
PT3 grant and previous PER workshops as well as members of the VaNTH
SLC (Student Leadership Council).
Participants
and Schedule of Events
|
The focus of this fourth workshop was to provide
additional and sustained assistance to the teachers as they continued
to design original LEGACY cycles. We began day one of the workshop with
research assistant Barb Austin leading the group through some
activities from Understanding By Design (Wiggins & McTighe, 1999).
The goal of these activities was to help the teachers build on their
specific content ideas generated during previous workshops in an effort
to prepare those ideas for inclusion in a LEGACY Cycle framework.
Austin began with a presentation (download
Powerpoint) designed to help the teachers identify the underlying
and enduring understandings related to their content ideas. Austin
continued with an activity focused on helping the teachers frame some
essential questions that address the enduring understandings previously
identified.
|

|
|

|
The day
continued with a presentation (download
PowerPoint) by research assistant Cherie McCollough on evidence for
understanding. At this time, the teachers began to formulate what would
become their challenge questions. McCollough also encouraged the
teachers to make decisions about how to assess the essential questions
developed in the earlier sessions. Through these activities, the
teachers were given opportunities to think deeply about their learning
goals and objectives for what would become their LEGACY Cycles. By the
day’s end, teachers were given time to present their challenge
questions and assessment ideas to the group for constructive feedback.
|
|
Day two began with a presentation (download
PowerPoint) by Cherie McCollough on
designing rubrics. McCollough and the teachers discussed how different
levels of knowledge (e.g. content worth being familiar with, content
important to know and do, or content that leads to enduring
understanding) often require different types of assessment strategies,
which in turn need different types of rubric design. Through a series
of activities, the teachers worked on articulating the important
elements of their assessment ideas from the previous day that should be
included in rubrics.
|

|
|

|
The day
continued with a presentation (download
PowerPoint) by research assistant Richard Vath, during which the
group revisited some of the theoretical ideas behind the LEGACY Cycle
and its components. It was now time for the teachers to begin to flesh
out their LEGACY Cycles, extending on their work from the previous day
and previous workshops. With the help of Cherie McCollough, Shelly
Rodriguez, and Richard Vath, the teachers spent the remainder of the
day articulating what they would include in each component of their
LEGACY Cycles. They were also introduced to a basic web template that
would allow them to build a web page around their LEGACY Cycles.
|
|
On the final day of the workshop, the teachers
were introduced to the work of Stacy Klein, a Research Assistant
Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt University and a
Physics, Math, and Biomedical Physics Teacher at the University School
of Nashville. Dr. Klein has years of experience with developing and
teaching with LEGACY Cycle modules in her high school classroom. After
introducing the teachers to some of the LEGACY cycles she has
developed, (download PowerPoint) she and the
group discussed some of the general challenges
to implementing modules such as these in real classrooms. She concluded
the day’s activities by offering her advice and suggestions to the
teachers as they continued to develop and refine their own LEGACY
cycles.
|

|
|

|
Additional
workshops are being planned for the fall of 2003 to provide support for
these teachers as they finalize their LEGACY cycles and prepare for
classroom implementation.
|
|

(Front, L-R) Melissa Tothero,
Tony Petrosino, Shelly Rodriguez, Richard Vath
(Back, L-R) Jesse
Gonzales, Angie Seckar-Martinez, T. Michael Word, Elaine Bohls-Graham,
Cherie Bielke, Carolyn McCormick, Cherie McCollough
|
|