This Forum is centered around the book “Designing for Science” which explores
the integration of recent research on everyday, classroom, and professional scientific
thinking. This edited volume brings together an international group of researchers to
present core findings from each context; discuss connections between contexts, and
explore structures; technologies, and environments to facilitate the development and
practice of scientific thinking. The chapters focus on: situations from young
children visiting museums, middle-school students collaborating in classrooms,
undergraduates learning about research methods, and professional scientists
engaged in cutting-edge research. A diverse set of approaches are represented,
including sociocultural description of situated cognition, cognitive
enthnography, educational design experiments, laboratory studies, and
artificial intelligence. This unique mix of work from the three contexts
deepens our understanding of each subfield while at the same time broadening
our understanding of how each subfield articulates with broader issues of
scientific thinking.
Course Expectations
Participation in class – Class discussion is crucial to the success of Forum.
By participating in a critical debate of the week’s readings, you and your
classmates will improve your ability to speak publicly about issues and ideas
and to question the scholarly positions of others. Four essays will also be
required to be completed. See “*” on Class Meetings for designated chapters for
reflection (750 words), due day of class.
Attendance – Class discussions are an extremely important part of
learning and on-time class attendance is mandatory. If you must miss
class, please notify me in advance to
discuss the situation
Grading – This is a pass/no pass seminar. It is expected as graduate
students you will not have excessive absences and that you will actively participate in classroom
discussion in a scholarly fashion. In the event you miss 3 or more classes you will
receive a NO PASS for the semester. In the event of continued none participation or not being prepared
for class discussion, a grade of NO PASS will be administered immediately
following a third warning from the instructor.
Required Material
DESIGNING FOR SCIENCE: Implications From Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings
Author: Kevin Crowley (ed.), D. Schunn (ed.), and Takeshi Okada (ed.)
Primary Subject: COGNITIVE SCIENCE Sec Subject: SCIENCE EDUCATION
ISBN: 0-8058-3474-5 Year: 2001
CLASS MEETINGS
January 14 - Introduction
January 21 - H.A. Simon, "Seek and Ye Shall Find": How Curiosity Engenders Discovery.
January 28 - M.A. Callanan,
J.L. Jipson, Explanatory Conversations
and Young Children's Developing Scientific Literacy.
February 4* - M. Azmitia, K. Crowley, The Rhythms of
Scientific Thinking: A Study of Collaboration in an Earthquake Microworld.
February 11 - C. Schunn, J. Anderson, Acquiring
Expertise in Science: Explorations of
What, When, and How. Last day to drop a course without a
possible academic penalty.
February 18 - K. Dunbar, What
Scientific Thinking Reveals About the Nature of Cognition
February 25* - R. Tweney, Scientific Thinking: A
Cognitive-Historical Approach.
March 4 - D.E. Penner,
Complexity, Emergence, and Synthetic
Models in Science Education
March 11 - SPRING BREAK NO CLASS
March 18* - R. Lehrer, L. Schauble, A. Petrosino, Reconsidering the Role of Experiment in Science Education.
March 25 - B. Loh, B.J.
Reiser, J. Radinsky, D.C. Edelson, L.M. Gomez, S. Marshall, Developing Reflective Inquiry Practices: A
Case Study of Software, Teacher, and Students.
April 1 - C.A. Chinn, B.A.
Malhotra, Epistemologically Authentic
Scientific Reasoning
April 8 - K. Crowley, J. Galco, Everyday Activity
and the Development of Scientific Thinking.
April 15 - J. Minstrell,
Facets of Students' Thinking: Designing
to Cross the Gap From Research to Standards-Based Practice
April 22* -
T. Okada, T. Shimokido, The Role of
Hypothesis Formation in Psychological Research.
April 29 - P. Thagard, Internet Epistemology: Contributions of New Information
Technologies to Scientific Research.
Academic Integrity - Policy
on Scholastic Dishonesty: Students who violate University rules on scholastic
dishonesty are subject to disciplinary penalties, including the possibility of
failure in the course and/or dismissal from The University. Since such
dishonesty harms the individual, all students, and the integrity of The
University, policies on scholastic dishonesty will be strictly enforced. Please
reference the following URL for more detailed information concerning University
policy
http://www.utexas.edu/depts/dos/sjs/academicintegrity2.html