Purpose
The Mission to Mars prototype learning environment is designed to
lead students to generate problems about the scientific challenge of
planning a Mars mission. It further supports student inquiry into solving
these problems. We feel that the Mars mission is an excellent problem
space because it lends itself to subproblems from every academic domain,
thus making it inherently cross-curricula. In addition, by arriving at a
number of common themes, we believe we are developing a curriculum that is
fully integrated.
The truly powerful ideas used by scientists are not the intellectual
property of any one field or discipline. Ideas about systems, scale,
change and constancy, and models have applications in business, law,
education, and politics, as well as in mathematics, technology and
science. These common themes are, in essence, ways of thinking rather than
theories or discoveries. According to the American Association for the
Advancement of Science in their 1993 publication, Benchmarks:
Some important themes pervade
science, mathematics, and
technology and appear over and over again, whether we are looking at an
ancient civilization, the human body, or a comet. They are ideas that
transcend disciplinary boundaries and prove fruitful in explanation, in
theory, in observation, and in design.
We have attempted to keep these common themes in mind as the driving force
of our unit (see Unifying Themes section below). By doing so, we
have
begun to develop a curriculum that is intellectually honest and that
bridges the gap between real-world knowledge and problem-solving ability
and the students' classroom activities. As the students come to a deeper
conceptual understanding of these common themes, we feel confident that we
will be facilitating the acquisition of the lifelong learning skills that
employers demand and workers will need in the global marketplace of the
21st century.
Curriculum Philosophy
This document attempts to describe a curriculum rather than a content
area. In differentiating the two, it is helpful to realize that content is
what students should know while curriculum is the way content is organized
and emphasized. The curriculum includes structure, organization, and
presentation of the content in the classroom.
To facilitate problem generation, the Learning Technology Center at
Vanderbilt University has developed a seven-minute video using existing
NASA footage. The Mars Mission Challenge video visually suggests the wide
variety of factors involved in planning and carrying out a human mission
to the planet Mars. The video narration explicitly challenges students to
pose problems within the domain of planning a mission. However, the video
does not limit the students to generating specific problems.
This unit spanned a total of 3 - 5 months in two Nashville 6th grade
classrooms. After the initial showing of the Mission to Mars
video (dilemma lesson), students were asked to generate an
exhaustive list of potential problems to research in order to actually
plan and complete a manned mission to the planet Mars. Once this step was
completed, the students, with guidance from the teacher, sorted the
questions into categories, one for each research group. Prior to the
categorization activity, the teacher and Mars expert determined optimal
categories to closely mirror the various disciplines that students in the
sixth grade encounter. Thus, the groups formed were 1) Medical Officer
(Human Factors), 2) Supply Officers (Equipment/Food), 3) Engineering
(Navigation/Propulsion), 4) Environmental Preservation Team (Spacecraft
Environment), 5) Spacecraft Design, and 6) Away Team (Surface
Exploration). The student-generated categories closely resembled these
optimal categories. In addition to being familiar to the students, these
categories were relatively exhaustive, covering major areas of concern for
space travel.
Students were asked to list in order of preference the specific research
group that most appealed to them. Unless specific social conflicts were of
concern to the teacher, every effort was made to match the students with
one of the specific research groups of their choosing. The day after the
dilemma lesson, research groups were formed and the students were handed
the entire list of the questions the class had generated for their
category. This provided the group with a reasonable start for their
research and helped each team prioritize the research goals.
Over the course of the next 2 months, these research groups spent a great
amount of time attempting to become classroom experts in their own
specific content area. They used trade books, news articles, authentic
materials from NASA, CD-ROM materials, and library books to thoroughly
research their area. After summarizing their findings, the specific
category groups broke apart into jigsaw groups, where each individual
shared the information researched by the whole group. Each new group now
had an "expert" from each of the initial content-specific groups. These
new groups had to plan a full mission to the planet Mars.
While complete details of the activities and resources used by the
students would be almost impossible, what follows is a specific guideline
that was employed throughout the 3 months by the resident expert on the
Mars Unit. Attention will be played to the role of "benchmark" lessons,
identification of initial conceptions, unifying themes emphasized
throughout the unit, resources which proved to be particularly helpful,
examples of e-mail correspondences with the students, and difficulties
and recommendations for the evolution of this unit.
|